On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 02:12:20PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> > > +
> > > + if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize > max_folio_size) {
> > > + xfs_warn(mp,
> > > +"block size (%u bytes) not supported; maximum folio size supported in "\
> > > +"the page cache is (%ld bytes). Check MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER (%d)",
> > > + mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize, max_folio_size,
> > > + MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
> > > + error = -ENOSYS;
> > > + goto out_free_sb;
> >
> > Nit: Continuation lines should be indented, not lined up with the next
> > statement:
> >
> > xfs_warn(mp,
> > "block size (%u bytes) not supported; maximum folio size supported in "\
> > "the page cache is (%ld bytes). Check MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER (%d)",
> > mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize,
> > max_folio_size,
> > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
> > error = -ENOSYS;
> > goto out_free_sb;
>
> @Darrick: As willy pointed out, the error message is a bit long here.
> Can we make as follows:
>
> "block size (%u bytes) not supported; Only block size (%ld) or less is supported "\
> mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize,
> max_folio_size);
>
> This is similar to the previous error and it is more concise IMO.
Ah, ok. I suppose printing max_folio_size *and* MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER is
redundant. The shortened version above is ok by me.
--D
> >
> > With that fixed,
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > --D
> >
>
