Re: [GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs procfs
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs procfs
From
: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:49:23 +0200
Cc
: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <CAHk-=wiGWLChxYmUA5HrT5aopZrB7_2VTa0NLZcxORgkUe5tEQ@mail.gmail.com>
> But not this horror. I agree and I didn't like it much myself (as evident from my pr message).
References
:
[GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs procfs
From:
Christian Brauner
Re: [GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs procfs
From:
Linus Torvalds
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] nsfs: iterate through mount namespaces
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] fs/file.c: optimize the critical section of file_lock in
Previous by thread:
Re: [GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs procfs
Next by thread:
[GIT PULL for v6.11] vfs mount
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Ext4 Filesystem]
[Union Filesystem]
[Filesystem Testing]
[Ceph Users]
[Ecryptfs]
[NTFS 3]
[AutoFS]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux Cachefs]
[Reiser Filesystem]
[Linux RAID]
[NTFS 3]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
[CEPH Development]
