Instead of synchronously reading one buffer at a time, submit reads as we walk the buffers in the first loop, then wait for them in the second loop. This should be significantly more efficient, particularly on HDDs, but I have not measured. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c index 204f53b23622..6d651ad788ac 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c @@ -174,7 +174,9 @@ mext_page_mkuptodate(struct folio *folio, unsigned from, unsigned to) sector_t block; struct buffer_head *bh, *head, *arr[MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE]; unsigned int blocksize, block_start, block_end; - int i, err, nr = 0, partial = 0; + int i, nr = 0; + bool partial = false; + BUG_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio)); BUG_ON(folio_test_writeback(folio)); @@ -192,13 +194,13 @@ mext_page_mkuptodate(struct folio *folio, unsigned from, unsigned to) block_end = block_start + blocksize; if (block_end <= from || block_start >= to) { if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) - partial = 1; + partial = true; continue; } if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) continue; if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) { - err = ext4_get_block(inode, block, bh, 0); + int err = ext4_get_block(inode, block, bh, 0); if (err) return err; if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) { @@ -207,6 +209,12 @@ mext_page_mkuptodate(struct folio *folio, unsigned from, unsigned to) continue; } } + lock_buffer(bh); + if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) { + unlock_buffer(bh); + continue; + } + ext4_read_bh_nowait(bh, 0, NULL); BUG_ON(nr >= MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE); arr[nr++] = bh; } @@ -216,11 +224,10 @@ mext_page_mkuptodate(struct folio *folio, unsigned from, unsigned to) for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { bh = arr[i]; - if (!bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh)) { - err = ext4_read_bh(bh, 0, NULL); - if (err) - return err; - } + wait_on_buffer(bh); + if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) + continue; + return -EIO; } out: if (!partial) -- 2.43.0