Re: [PATCH v4 13/29] arm64: convert protection key into vm_flags and pgprot values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 02:35:48PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/3/24 18:31, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > Modify arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() and vm_get_page_prot() such that the pkey
> > value is set in the vm_flags and then into the pgprot value.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h | 8 +++++++-
> >  arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c          | 9 +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
> > index 5966ee4a6154..ecb2d18dc4d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> >  #include <uapi/asm/mman.h>
> >  
> >  static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot,
> > -	unsigned long pkey __always_unused)
> > +	unsigned long pkey)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long ret = 0;
> >  
> > @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot,
> >  	if (system_supports_mte() && (prot & PROT_MTE))
> >  		ret |= VM_MTE;
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS)
> > +	ret |= pkey & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0;
> > +	ret |= pkey & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0;
> > +	ret |= pkey & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0;
> 
> 0x1, 0x2, 0x4 here are standard bit positions for their corresponding
> VM_KEY_XXX based protection values ? Although this is similar to what
> x86 is doing currently, hence just trying to understand if these bit
> positions here are related to the user visible ABI, which should be
> standardized ?

The bit positions of VM_PKEY_BIT* aren't user visible. This is converting the
value of the `pkey` that was passed to the mprotect, into the internal flags.

I might replace those hex values with BIT(0), BIT(1), BIT(2), might be clearer.

> 
> Agree with previous comments about the need for system_supports_poe()
> based additional check for the above code block.
> 
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  #define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> > index 642bdf908b22..86eda6bc7893 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -102,6 +102,15 @@ pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> >  	if (vm_flags & VM_MTE)
> >  		prot |= PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_TAGGED);
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
> > +	if (vm_flags & VM_PKEY_BIT0)
> > +		prot |= PTE_PO_IDX_0;
> > +	if (vm_flags & VM_PKEY_BIT1)
> > +		prot |= PTE_PO_IDX_1;
> > +	if (vm_flags & VM_PKEY_BIT2)
> > +		prot |= PTE_PO_IDX_2;
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  	return __pgprot(prot);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_get_page_prot);
> 

Thanks,
Joey




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux