Re: [syzbot] [lsm?] general protection fault in hook_inode_free_security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > ... or we find a better placement in the VFS for
> > security_inode_free(), is that is possible.  It may not be, our VFS
> > friends should be able to help here.

The place where you do it currently is pretty good. I don't see an easy
way to call it from somewhere else without forcing every filesystem to
either implement a free_inode or destroy_inode hook.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux