Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] forcealign for xfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 04:24:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> The actual forcealign patches are the same in this series, modulo an
> attempt for a fix in xfs_bunmapi_align().
> 
> Why forcealign?
> In some scenarios to may be required to guarantee extent alignment and
> granularity.
> 
> For example, for atomic writes, the maximum atomic write unit size would
> be limited at the extent alignment and granularity, guaranteeing that an
> atomic write would not span data present in multiple extents.
> 
> forcealign may be useful as a performance tuning optimization in other
> scenarios.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux