On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 03:04:40PM GMT, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 15:00, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > We could go this way I suppose, but again this is a lot of work, and honestly I > > just want to log mount options into some database so I can go looking for people > > doing weird shit on my giant fleet of machines/containers. Would the iter thing > > make the overlayfs thing better? Yeah for sure. Do we care? I don't think so, > > we just want all the options, and we can all strsep/strtok with a comma. > > I think we can live with the monolithic option block. However I'd > prefer the separator to be a null character, thus the options could be > sent unescaped. That way the iterator will be a lot simpler to > implement. For libmount it means writing a new parser and Karel prefers the "," format so I would like to keep the current format.
