On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 11:04 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > Below is a diff which compiles but is untested. It adds AT_EMPTY_PATH + > > NULL as suggsted by Linus, but it can be adjusted for AT_NO_PATH (which > > would be my preffered option, or better yet not do that and add fstatx). > > > > It does not do the hack to 0-check if a pointer was passed along with > > AT_EMPTY_PATH but that again is an easy addition. > > > > Feel free to take without attribution: > > I'd still like to make it Co-developed-by: or just From: you. Could you > give a S-o-b? > I just trivially shuffled some things around and did not even test, so I'm not signing off on squat here. :) However, if you insist you can add something like "Written after picking up an initial patch written by Mateusz Guzik, see [link goes here]" or similar. > And with this change AT_FDCWD with AT_EMPTY_PATH and NULL path does not > work. For consistency it'd be better to make it work too: > Good catch, I have no opinion which way to fix it. -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
