On 6/20/24 14:53, John Garry wrote:
Support atomic writes by submitting a single BIO with the REQ_ATOMIC set.
It must be ensured that the atomic write adheres to its rules, like
naturally aligned offset, so call blkdev_dio_invalid() ->
blkdev_atomic_write_valid() [with renaming blkdev_dio_unaligned() to
blkdev_dio_invalid()] for this purpose. The BIO submission path currently
checks for atomic writes which are too large, so no need to check here.
In blkdev_direct_IO(), if the nr_pages exceeds BIO_MAX_VECS, then we cannot
produce a single BIO, so error in this case.
Finally set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE when the bdev can support atomic writes
and the associated file flag is for O_DIRECT.
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/fops.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
index 376265935714..be36c9fbd500 100644
--- a/block/fops.c
+++ b/block/fops.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static blk_opf_t dio_bio_write_op(struct kiocb *iocb)
return opf;
}
-static bool blkdev_dio_unaligned(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
- struct iov_iter *iter)
+static bool blkdev_dio_invalid(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
+ struct iov_iter *iter, bool is_atomic)
{
+ if (is_atomic && !generic_atomic_write_valid(iter, pos))
+ return true;
+
return pos & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1) ||
!bdev_iter_is_aligned(bdev, iter);
}
@@ -72,6 +75,8 @@ static ssize_t __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb,
bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = pos >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
bio.bi_write_hint = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp)->i_write_hint;
bio.bi_ioprio = iocb->ki_ioprio;
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
+ bio.bi_opf |= REQ_ATOMIC;
ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(&bio, iter);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -343,6 +348,9 @@ static ssize_t __blkdev_direct_IO_async(struct kiocb *iocb,
task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
+ bio->bi_opf |= REQ_ATOMIC;
+
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
@@ -359,12 +367,13 @@ static ssize_t __blkdev_direct_IO_async(struct kiocb *iocb,
static ssize_t blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
{
struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host);
+ bool is_atomic = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC;
unsigned int nr_pages;
if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
return 0;
- if (blkdev_dio_unaligned(bdev, iocb->ki_pos, iter))
+ if (blkdev_dio_invalid(bdev, iocb->ki_pos, iter, is_atomic))
Why not passing in iocb->ki_flags here?
Or, indeed, the entire iocb?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
