On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:04:20PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 01:32:42PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > So the following can still be there from Hannes patch as we have a > stable reference: > > ractl->_workingset |= folio_test_workingset(folio); > - ractl->_nr_pages++; > + ractl->_nr_pages += folio_nr_pages(folio); > + i += folio_nr_pages(folio); > } We _can_, but we just allocated it, so we know what size it is already. I'm starting to feel that Hannes' patch should be combined with this one.
