Hi Al, Finally got around to some numbers and a few comments with vfsmount scaling. Patch looks a bit nicer now, and numbers aren't too bad I think. I also broke the brlock stuff into its own header... it's a bit ugly but I couldn't see a nice way to do the per-CPU stuff without adding indirection and memory allocation of dynamic per-CPU allocations. Anyone like to yell at me for this, or suggest a better approach? I also put some other reasonable looking bits and pieces in there which have filtered to the bottom of my vfs stack, as there are some clashes otherwise. If you want me to stop sending them to you, could you merge them or tell me why I'm an idiot, please? Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
