On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:38:15AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:27:27AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > The case I tested that failed the test was tmpfs with huge pages (not > > > large folios). So should we then have this: > > > > No. > > OK so this does have a change for tmpfs with huge pages enabled, do we > take the position then this is a fix for that? You literally said it was a fix just a few messages up thread? Besides, the behaviour changes (currently) depending on whether you specify "within_size" or "always". This patch makes it consistent.
