While I 100% stand behind the patch I found the lockref issue
mentioned below reproduces almost reliably on my box if given enough
time, thus I'm going to need to fix it first.
As such consider this patch posting as a heads up, don't pull it.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 6:47 PM Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stock kernel scales worse than FreeBSD when doing a 20-way stat(2) on
> the same tmpfs-backed file.
>
> According to perf top:
> 38.09% [kernel] [k] lockref_put_return
> 26.08% [kernel] [k] lockref_get_not_dead
> 25.60% [kernel] [k] __d_lookup_rcu
> 0.89% [kernel] [k] clear_bhb_loop
>
> __d_lookup_rcu is participating in cacheline ping pong due to the
> embedded name sharing a cacheline with lockref.
>
> Moving it out resolves the problem:
> 41.50% [kernel] [k] lockref_put_return
> 41.03% [kernel] [k] lockref_get_not_dead
> 1.54% [kernel] [k] clear_bhb_loop
>
> benchmark (will-it-scale, Sapphire Rapids, tmpfs, ops/s):
> FreeBSD:7219334
> before: 5038006
> after: 7842883 (+55%)
>
> One minor remark: the 'after' result is unstable, fluctuating between
> ~7.8 mln and ~9 mln between restarts of the test. I picked the lower
> bound.
>
> An important remark: lockref API has a deficiency where if the spinlock
> is taken for any reason and there is a continuous stream of incs/decs,
> it will never recover back to atomic op -- everyone will be stuck taking
> the lock. I used to run into it on occasion when spawning 'perf top'
> while benchmarking, but now that the pressure on lockref itself is
> increased I randomly see it merely when benchmarking.
>
> It looks like this:
> min:308703 max:429561 total:8217844 <-- nice start
> min:152207 max:178380 total:3501879 <-- things are degrading
> min:65563 max:70106 total:1349677 <-- everyone is stuck locking
> min:69001 max:72873 total:1424714
> min:68993 max:73084 total:1425902
>
> The fix would be to add a variant which will wait for the lock to be
> released for some number of spins, and only take it after to still
> guarantee forward progress. I'm going to look into it. Mentioned in the
> commit message if someone runs into it as is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/dcache.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
> index bf53e3894aae..326dbccc3736 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dcache.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
> @@ -89,13 +89,18 @@ struct dentry {
> struct inode *d_inode; /* Where the name belongs to - NULL is
> * negative */
> unsigned char d_iname[DNAME_INLINE_LEN]; /* small names */
> + /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 32 bytes ago --- */
>
> /* Ref lookup also touches following */
> - struct lockref d_lockref; /* per-dentry lock and refcount */
> const struct dentry_operations *d_op;
> struct super_block *d_sb; /* The root of the dentry tree */
> unsigned long d_time; /* used by d_revalidate */
> void *d_fsdata; /* fs-specific data */
> + /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
> + struct lockref d_lockref; /* per-dentry lock and refcount
> + * keep separate from RCU lookup area if
> + * possible!
> + */
>
> union {
> struct list_head d_lru; /* LRU list */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
