Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/12/24 15:32, Bernd Schubert wrote:
On 6/12/24 09:39, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Personally I don't see anything twisted here, one just needs to
understand that IORING_OP_URING_CMD was written for that reverse order.

That's just my gut feeling.   fuse/dev_uring.c is 1233 in this RFC.
And that's just the queuing.



Btw, counting lines, majority of that is not queuing and handling requests,
but setting up things, shutdown (start/stop is already almost half of the file)
and then and doing sanity checks, as in fuse_uring_get_verify_queue().




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux