Hi all, On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 04:53:10 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 08:16:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:15:38 +0200 Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if it's relevant, but gfs2 is closely related to dlm, and dlm > > > isn't included here. Would it make sense to either move dlm into fs-next, or > > > move gfs2 out of it, to where dlm is merged? > > > > I don't know the answer to those questions, sorry. Hopefully someone > > can advise us. > > I would add the DLM tree to fs-next since it's a normal dependency of gfs2. I have done that from today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpqGJgs8DbMp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
