Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] fs/procfs: use per-VMA RCU-protected locking in PROCMAP_QUERY API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:25 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Attempt to use RCU-protected per-VMA lock when looking up requested VMA
> as much as possible, only falling back to mmap_lock if per-VMA lock
> failed. This is done so that querying of VMAs doesn't interfere with
> other critical tasks, like page fault handling.
>
> This has been suggested by mm folks, and we make use of a newly added
> internal API that works like find_vma(), but tries to use per-VMA lock.
>
> We have two sets of setup/query/teardown helper functions with different
> implementations depending on availability of per-VMA lock (conditioned
> on CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK) to abstract per-VMA lock subtleties.
>
> When per-VMA lock is available, lookup is done under RCU, attempting to
> take a per-VMA lock. If that fails, we fallback to mmap_lock, but then
> proceed to unconditionally grab per-VMA lock again, dropping mmap_lock
> immediately. In this configuration mmap_lock is never helf for long,
> minimizing disruptions while querying.
>
> When per-VMA lock is compiled out, we take mmap_lock once, query VMAs
> using find_vma() API, and then unlock mmap_lock at the very end once as
> well. In this setup we avoid locking/unlocking mmap_lock on every looked
> up VMA (depending on query parameters we might need to iterate a few of
> them).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 614fbe5d0667..140032ffc551 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -388,6 +388,49 @@ static int pid_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>                 PROCMAP_QUERY_VMA_FLAGS                         \
>  )
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> +static int query_vma_setup(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +       /* in the presence of per-VMA lock we don't need any setup/teardown */
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void query_vma_teardown(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +       /* in the presence of per-VMA lock we need to unlock vma, if present */
> +       if (vma)
> +               vma_end_read(vma);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +       struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +       /* try to use less disruptive per-VMA lock */
> +       vma = find_and_lock_vma_rcu(mm, addr);
> +       if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> +               /* failed to take per-VMA lock, fallback to mmap_lock */
> +               if (mmap_read_lock_killable(mm))
> +                       return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> +
> +               vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> +               if (vma) {
> +                       /*
> +                        * We cannot use vma_start_read() as it may fail due to
> +                        * false locked (see comment in vma_start_read()). We
> +                        * can avoid that by directly locking vm_lock under
> +                        * mmap_lock, which guarantees that nobody can lock the
> +                        * vma for write (vma_start_write()) under us.
> +                        */
> +                       down_read(&vma->vm_lock->lock);

Hi Andrii,
The above pattern of locking VMA under mmap_lock and then dropping
mmap_lock is becoming more common. Matthew had an RFC proposal for an
API to do this here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZivhG0yrbpFqORDw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/. It
might be worth reviving that discussion.

> +               }
> +
> +               mmap_read_unlock(mm);

Later on in your code you are calling get_vma_name() which might call
anon_vma_name() to retrieve user-defined VMA name. After this patch
this operation will be done without holding mmap_lock, however per
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/mm_types.h#L582
this function has to be called with mmap_lock held for read. Indeed
with debug flags enabled you should hit this assertion:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/madvise.c#L96.

> +       }
> +
> +       return vma;
> +}
> +#else
>  static int query_vma_setup(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>         return mmap_read_lock_killable(mm);
> @@ -402,6 +445,7 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsig
>  {
>         return find_vma(mm, addr);
>  }
> +#endif
>
>  static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
>                                                  unsigned long addr, u32 flags)
> @@ -441,8 +485,10 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  skip_vma:
>         /*
>          * If the user needs closest matching VMA, keep iterating.
> +        * But before we proceed we might need to unlock current VMA.
>          */
>         addr = vma->vm_end;
> +       vma_end_read(vma); /* no-op under !CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
>         if (flags & PROCMAP_QUERY_COVERING_OR_NEXT_VMA)
>                 goto next_vma;
>  no_vma:
> --
> 2.43.0
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux