Re: Is is reasonable to support quota in fuse?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Friendly ping...

JunChao Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx> 于2024年6月3日周一 19:36写道:
>
> Currently, FUSE in the kernel part does not support quotas. If users
> want to implement quota functionality with FUSE, they can only achieve
> this at the user level using the underlying file system features.
> However, if the underlying file system, such as btrfs, does not
> support UID/GID level quotas and only support subvolume level quota,
> users will need to find alternative methods to implement quota
> functionality.
>
> And consider another scenario: implementing a FUSE file system on top
> of an ext4 file system, but all writes to ext4 are done as a single
> user (e.g., root). In this case, ext4's UID and GID quotas are not
> applicable, and users need to find other ways to implement quotas for
> users or groups.
>
> Given these challenges, I would like to inquire about the community's
> perspective on implementing quota functionality at the FUSE kernel
> part. Is it feasible to implement quota functionality in the FUSE
> kernel module, allowing users to set quotas for FUSE just as they
> would for ext4 (e.g., using commands like quotaon /mnt/fusefs or
> quotaset /mnt/fusefs)?  Would the community consider accepting patches
> for this feature?
>
> I look forward to your insights on this matter.
>
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
>
> Best regards.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux