Hello, On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:39:18PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > > Isn't this a bit nasty? The helper skips updating states because it knows > > the caller is not going to use them? I'm not sure the slight code reduction > > justifies the added subtlety. > > It's a general rule that wb should not be limited if the wb is in freerun state. > So I think it's intuitive to obey the rule in both balance_wb_limits and it's > caller in which case balance_wb_limits and it's caller should stop to do anything > when freerun state of wb is first seen. > But no insistant on this... Hmm... can you at least add comments pointing out that if freerun, the limits fields are invalid? Thanks. -- tejun
