On 6/3/24 15:03, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 20:01, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
>> @@ -1079,12 +1079,79 @@ struct fuse_backing_map {
>> uint64_t padding;
>> };
>>
>> +enum fuse_uring_ioctl_cmd {
>> + /* not correctly initialized when set */
>> + FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_INVALID = 0,
>> +
>> + /* Ioctl to prepare communucation with io-uring */
>> + FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_RING_CFG = 1,
>> +
>> + /* Ring queue configuration ioctl */
>> + FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_QUEUE_CFG = 2,
>> +};
>
> Is there a reason why these cannot be separate ioctl commands?
I just personally didn't like the idea to have multiple ioctl commands
for the same feature. Initially there were also more ioctls. Easy to
change if you prefer that.
Thanks,
Bernd
