Re: Addressing architectural differences between FUSE driver and fs - Re: virtio-fs tests between host(x86) and dpu(arm64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 10:53, Peter-Jan Gootzen <pgootzen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We also considered this idea, it would kind of be like locking FUSE into
> being x86. However I think this is not backwards compatible. Currently
> an ARM64 client and ARM64 server work just fine. But making such a
> change would break if the client has the new driver version and the
> server is not updated to know that it should interpret x86 specifically.

This would need to be negotiated, of course.

But it's certainly simpler to just indicate the client arch in the
INIT request.   Let's go with that for now.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux