Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] NFSv3: implement extended attribute (XATTR) protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

> I assume that it was in order to avoid that question that this initial
> implementation only exports the user.* namespace, since xattr's in that
> name space are by design not given any special interpretation by the
> filesystem--they just store and return opaque data.

Correct -- there are no system semantics (beyond existing DACsecurity 
checks), so it's straightforward.

Other namespaces would need to have semantics defined on a case by case 
basis.


> 
> --b.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Note that I'll be giving a talk on this at LinuxCon on Thursday:
> > > http://linuxcon.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/1589 So, in addition to
> > > discussion here, please come along to the talk if you're at the conf, and
> > > we may also be able to discuss it at Plumbers in one of the BoFs.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Ah, I was there, and I was asking around wanting to talk about the issue!
> > Ah well.
> > 
> > sri
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux