> I'd put fs options in there too, but that was something Christian > disliked. We should have a discussion about how to retrieve options, > and maybe the other things like label, devname, etc will fall out of > that too. Let me rephrase what I mean as I probably wasn't clear enough in my first mail. My objection is mostly that I don't want us to start putting stuff in there that's not generic. And yes, some statfs() fields might make sense to put in statmount(). But I think stuff like "f_files" or "f_ffree" is really something that's misplaced in statmount().
