Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/19] fuse: Add fuse-io-uring design documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:00:39PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io-uring.rst | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 167 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io-uring.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io-uring.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4aa168e3b229
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io-uring.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +===============================
> +FUSE Uring design documentation
> +==============================
> +
> +This documentation covers basic details how the fuse
> +kernel/userspace communication through uring is configured
> +and works. For generic details about FUSE see fuse.rst.
> +
> +This document also covers the current interface, which is
> +still in development and might change.
> +
> +Limitations
> +===========
> +As of now not all requests types are supported through uring, userspace

s/userspace side/userspace/

> +side is required to also handle requests through /dev/fuse after
> +uring setup is complete. These are especially notifications (initiated

especially is an awkward word choice here, I'm not quite sure what you're trying
say here, perhaps

"Specifically notifications (initiated from the daemon side), interrupts and
forgets"

?

> +from daemon side), interrupts and forgets.
> +Interrupts are probably not working at all when uring is used. At least
> +current state of libfuse will not be able to handle those for requests
> +on ring queues.
> +All these limitation will be addressed later.
> +
> +Fuse uring configuration
> +========================
> +
> +Fuse kernel requests are queued through the classical /dev/fuse
> +read/write interface - until uring setup is complete.
> +
> +In order to set up fuse-over-io-uring userspace has to send ioctls,
> +mmap requests in the right order
> +
> +1) FUSE_DEV_IOC_URING ioctl with FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_RING_CFG
> +
> +First the basic kernel data structure has to be set up, using
> +FUSE_DEV_IOC_URING with subcommand FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_RING_CFG.
> +
> +Example (from libfuse)
> +
> +static int fuse_uring_setup_kernel_ring(int session_fd,
> +					int nr_queues, int sync_qdepth,
> +					int async_qdepth, int req_arg_len,
> +					int req_alloc_sz)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	struct fuse_ring_config rconf = {
> +		.nr_queues		    = nr_queues,
> +		.sync_queue_depth	= sync_qdepth,
> +		.async_queue_depth	= async_qdepth,
> +		.req_arg_len		= req_arg_len,
> +		.user_req_buf_sz	= req_alloc_sz,
> +		.numa_aware		    = nr_queues > 1,
> +	};
> +
> +	struct fuse_uring_cfg ioc_cfg = {
> +		.flags = 0,
> +		.cmd = FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_RING_CFG,
> +		.rconf = rconf,
> +	};
> +
> +	rc = ioctl(session_fd, FUSE_DEV_IOC_URING, &ioc_cfg);
> +	if (rc)
> +		rc = -errno;
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +2) MMAP
> +
> +For shared memory communication between kernel and userspace
> +each queue has to allocate and map memory buffer.
> +For numa awares kernel side verifies if the allocating thread

This bit is awkwardly worded and there's some spelling mistakes.  Perhaps
something like this?

"For numa aware kernels, the kernel verifies that the allocating thread is bound
to a single core, as the kernel has the expectation that only a single thread
accesses a queue, and for numa aware memory allocation the core of the thread
sending the mmap request is used to identify the numa node"

> +is bound to a single core - in general kernel side has expectations
> +that only a single thread accesses a queue and for numa aware
> +memory alloation the core of the thread sending the mmap request
> +is used to identify the numa node.
> +
> +The offsset parameter has to be FUSE_URING_MMAP_OFF to identify
       ^^^^ "offset"

> +it is a request concerning fuse-over-io-uring.
> +
> +3) FUSE_DEV_IOC_URING ioctl with FUSE_URING_IOCTL_CMD_QUEUE_CFG
> +
> +This ioctl has to be send for every queue and takes the queue-id (qid)
                        ^^^^ "sent"

> +and memory address obtained by mmap to set up queue data structures.
> +
> +Kernel - userspace interface using uring
> +========================================
> +
> +After queue ioctl setup and memory mapping userspace submits

This needs a comma, so

"After queue ioctl setup and memory mapping, userspace submites"

> +SQEs (opcode = IORING_OP_URING_CMD) in order to fetch
> +fuse requests. Initial submit is with the sub command
> +FUSE_URING_REQ_FETCH, which will just register entries
> +to be available on the kernel side - it sets the according

s/according/associated/ maybe?

> +entry state and marks the entry as available in the queue bitmap.
> +
> +Once all entries for all queues are submitted kernel side starts
> +to enqueue to ring queue(s). The request is copied into the shared
> +memory queue entry buffer and submitted as CQE to the userspace
> +side.
> +Userspace side handles the CQE and submits the result as subcommand
> +FUSE_URING_REQ_COMMIT_AND_FETCH - kernel side does completes the requests

"the kernel completes the request"

Thanks,

Josef




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux