Re: [RFC 0/2] fuse: introduce fuse server recovery mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/28/24 10:45 AM, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/27/24 11:16 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 08:40, Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> 3. I don't know if a kernel based recovery mechanism is welcome on the
>>> community side.  Any comment is welcome.  Thanks!
>>
>> I'd prefer something external to fuse.
> 
> Okay, understood.
> 
>>
>> Maybe a kernel based fdstore (lifetime connected to that of the
>> container) would a useful service more generally?
> 
> Yeah I indeed had considered this, but I'm afraid VFS guys would be
> concerned about why we do this on kernel side rather than in user space.
> 
> I'm not sure what the VFS guys think about this and if the kernel side
> shall care about this.
> 

There was an RFC for kernel-side fdstore [1], though it's also
implemented upon FUSE.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+a=Yy5rnqLqH2iR-ZY6AUkNJy48mroVV3Exmhmt-pfTi82kXA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/



-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux