Re: [rfc][patch] store-free path walking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> It won't double it, because there are many more cache lines from
> all kinds of other things in these paths.

Not all that many. The big part of the D$ is the hash table lookup in this 
path.

> The point was just to hide the latency of fetching two at different 
> times. The actual cache foot print is not that important, as long as 
> it's not excessive

You're full of sh*t.

Every extra line you fetch pushes out another line. No amount of 
prefetching will hide that. So stop spreading idiotic fairytales.

The best optimization is to not do the work at all. It really is that 
simple.  Prefetching as an optimization technique absolutely sucks.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux