Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: syzbot <syzbot+85e58cdf5b3136471d4b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 15:50:57 +0200
Cc: amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, clm@xxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <000000000000f6865106191c3e58@google.com>

#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/overlayfs/vfs.git
 f74ee925761ead1a07a5e42e1cb1f2d59ab75b8c

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags
  - From: syzbot

References:
- [syzbot] [btrfs?] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags
  - From: syzbot

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: efs: add MODULE_DESCRIPTION()
Next by Date: Re: About the conflict between XFS inode recycle and VFS rcu-walk
Previous by thread: Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags
Next by thread: Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_flags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux