Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/5/20 16:06, Jingbo Xu wrote:

On 5/15/24 4:45 PM, libaokun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>

We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962

CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
Call Trace:
  kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
  cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
  vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
  ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0

Allocated by task 626:
  __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
  cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
  cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
  cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
  cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
  fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
  [...]

Freed by task 626:
  kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
  cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
  cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
  cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
  cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
  cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
  fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
  [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

      mount  |   daemon_thread1    |    daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
  cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
   cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
    REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
    wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)

             cachefiles_daemon_read
              cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
               REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
               cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
               copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
             process_open_req(REQ_A)
                                   ------ restore ------
                                   cachefiles_ondemand_restore
                                   xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
                                    xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);

                                   cachefiles_daemon_read
                                    cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
                                     REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req

              write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
              cachefiles_ondemand_copen
               xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
               complete(&REQ_A->done)
    kfree(REQ_A)
                                     cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
                                      fd = get_unused_fd_flags
                                      file = anon_inode_getfile
                                      fd_install(fd, file)
                                      load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
                                      load->fd = fd;
                                      // load UAF !!!

This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still
alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then
released when the waiting and reading is over.

Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to
avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.

Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
How could we protect it from being erased from the xarray with the same
message id in this case?

We will hold xa_lock while erasing the id to avoid concurrency.

--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux