Re: [PATCH 1/3] capabilities: user namespace capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Calmels <jcalmels@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 06:32:46AM GMT, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> Pointers please?
>> 
>> That sentence sounds about 5 years out of date.
>
> The link referenced is from last year.
> Here are some others often cited by distributions:
>
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0185
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1015
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2078
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24122
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25636
>
> Recent thread discussing this too:
> https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2024/q2/128

My apologies perhaps I trimmed too much.

I know that user namespaces enlarge the attack surface.
How much and how serious could be debated but for unprivileged
users the attack surface is undoubtedly enlarged.

As I read your introduction you were justifying the introduction
of a new security mechanism with the observation that distributions
were carrying distribution specific patches.

To the best of my knowledge distribution specific patches and
distributions disabling user namespaces have been gone for quite a
while.  So if that has changed recently I would like to know.

Thank you,
Eric






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux