On 16. 05. 24, 7:28, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 15. 05. 24, 18:39, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 01:10:49PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 13. 02. 24, 17:45, Christian Brauner wrote:
This moves pidfds from the anonymous inode infrastructure to a tiny
pseudo filesystem. This has been on my todo for quite a while as it
will
unblock further work that we weren't able to do simply because of the
very justified limitations of anonymous inodes. Moving pidfds to a tiny
pseudo filesystem allows:
* statx() on pidfds becomes useful for the first time.
* pidfds can be compared simply via statx() and then comparing inode
numbers.
* pidfds have unique inode numbers for the system lifetime.
* struct pid is now stashed in inode->i_private instead of
file->private_data. This means it is now possible to introduce
concepts that operate on a process once all file descriptors
have been
closed. A concrete example is kill-on-last-close.
* file->private_data is freed up for per-file options for pidfds.
* Each struct pid will refer to a different inode but the same struct
pid will refer to the same inode if it's opened multiple times. In
contrast to now where each struct pid refers to the same inode.
Even
if we were to move to anon_inode_create_getfile() which creates new
inodes we'd still be associating the same struct pid with multiple
different inodes.
* Pidfds now go through the regular dentry_open() path which means that
all security hooks are called unblocking proper LSM management for
pidfds. In addition fsnotify hooks are called and allow for
listening
to open events on pidfds.
The tiny pseudo filesystem is not visible anywhere in userspace exactly
like e.g., pipefs and sockfs. There's no lookup, there's no complex
inode operations, nothing. Dentries and inodes are always deleted when
the last pidfd is closed.
This breaks lsof and util-linux.
Without the commit, lsof shows:
systemd ... 59 [pidfd:899]
With the commit:
systemd ... 1187 pidfd
And that user-visible change breaks a lot of stuff, incl. lsof tests.
For util-linux, its test fail with:
[ 125s] --- tests/expected/lsfd/column-name-pidfd 2024-05-06
07:20:54.655845940 +0000
[ 125s] +++ tests/output/lsfd/column-name-pidfd 2024-05-15
01:04:15.406666666 +0000
[ 125s] @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
[ 125s] -3 anon_inode:[pidfd] pid=1 comm= nspid=1
[ 125s] +3 pidfd:[INODENUM] pidfd:[INODENUM]
[ 125s] pidfd:ASSOC,KNAME,NAME: 0
[ 125s] lsfd: NAME and KNAME column: [02]
pidfd ... FAILED (lsfd/column-name-pidfd)
And:
[ 125s] --- tests/expected/lsfd/column-type-pidfd 2024-05-06
07:20:54.655845940 +0000
[ 125s] +++ tests/output/lsfd/column-type-pidfd 2024-05-15
01:04:15.573333333 +0000
[ 125s] @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
[ 125s] -3 UNKN pidfd
[ 125s] +3 REG REG
[ 125s] pidfd:ASSOC,STTYPE,TYPE: 0
[ 125s] lsfd: TYPE and STTYPE column: [02]
pidfd ... FAILED (lsfd/column-type-pidfd)
Any ideas?
util-linux upstream is already handling that correctly now but it
seems that
lsof is not. To fix this in the kernel we'll need something like. If
you could
test this it'd be great as I'm currently traveling:
diff --git a/fs/pidfs.c b/fs/pidfs.c
index a63d5d24aa02..3da848a8a95e 100644
--- a/fs/pidfs.c
+++ b/fs/pidfs.c
@@ -201,10 +201,8 @@ static const struct super_operations pidfs_sops = {
static char *pidfs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int
buflen)
{
- struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
- struct pid *pid = inode->i_private;
-
- return dynamic_dname(buffer, buflen, "pidfd:[%llu]", pid->ino);
+ /* Fake the old name as some userspace seems to rely on this. */
+ return dynamic_dname(buffer, buflen, "anon_inode:[pidfd]");
No, the lsof test runs "lsof -p $pid -a -d $fd -F pfn" and expects:
"p${pid} f${fd} n[pidfd:$pid]"
But it gets now:
p959 f3 nanon_inode
I.e. "anon_inode" instead of "n[pidfd:959]".
Did you intend to fix by the patch the lsfd's (util-linux)
column-name-pidfd test by this instead (the above)?
This is now discussed in https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/317 too.
So yeah,
# ll /proc/984/fd
total 0
lrwx------ 1 xslaby users 64 May 17 09:00 0 -> /dev/pts/1
lrwx------ 1 xslaby users 64 May 17 09:00 2 -> /dev/pts/1
lrwx------ 1 xslaby users 64 May 17 09:00 3 -> anon_inode:[pidfd]
looks good with the patch. But lsof checks if this IS_REG(). And if it
is, pidfd handling is not done.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
