On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:13:22AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:29:06AM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > When running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer > > overflow sanitizer we encounter this report: > > why do you keep saying it's unintentional? it's clearly intended. Because they are short on actual bugs to be found by their tooling and attempt to inflate the sound/noise rate; therefore, every time when overflow _IS_ handled correctly, it must have been an accident - we couldn't have possibly done the analysis correctly. And if somebody insists that they _are_ capable of basic math, they must be dishonest. So... "unintentional" it's going to be. <southpark> Math is hard, mmkay? </southpark> Al, more than slightly annoyed by that aspect of the entire thing...
