On Mon, May 13 2024 at 20:05, Adrian Huang wrote:
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> {
> static int prec;
>
> - unsigned long flags, any_count = 0;
> + unsigned long flags, print_irq = 1;
What's wrong with making print_irq boolean?
> int i = *(loff_t *) v, j;
> struct irqaction *action;
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> @@ -488,18 +488,28 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> if (!desc || irq_settings_is_hidden(desc))
> goto outsparse;
>
> - if (desc->kstat_irqs) {
> - for_each_online_cpu(j)
> - any_count |= data_race(*per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j));
> + if ((!desc->action || irq_desc_is_chained(desc)) && desc->kstat_irqs) {
The condition is wrong. Look how the old code evaluated any_count.
> + print_irq = 0;
> + for_each_online_cpu(j) {
> + if (data_race(*per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j))) {
> + print_irq = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Aside of that this code is just fundamentally wrong in several aspects:
1) Interrupts which have no action are completely uninteresting as
there is no real information attached, i.e. it shows that there
were interrupts on some CPUs, but there is zero information from
which device they originated.
Especially with sparse interrupts enabled they are usually gone
shortly after the last action was removed.
2) Chained interrupts do not have a count at all as they completely
evade the core kernel entry points.
So all of this can be avoided and the whole nonsense can be reduced to:
if (!desc->action || irq_desc_is_chained(desc) || !desc->kstat_irqs)
goto outsparse;
which in turn allows to convert this:
> - for_each_online_cpu(j)
> - seq_printf(p, "%10u ", desc->kstat_irqs ?
> - *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j) : 0);
into an unconditional:
for_each_online_cpu(j)
seq_printf(p, "%10u ", *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j));
Thanks,
tglx
