Re: [lvc-project] [PATCH] [RFC] dma-buf: fix race condition between poll and close

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 07.05.24 um 12:40 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 06.05.24 um 08:52 schrieb Fedor Pchelkin:
On Fri, 03. May 14:08, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
On 5/3/24 11:18 AM, Christian König wrote:

Attached is a compile only tested patch, please verify if it fixes your problem.
LGTM, and this is similar to get_file() in __pollwait() and fput() in
free_poll_entry() used in implementation of poll(). Please resubmit to
linux-fsdevel@ including the following:

Reported-by: syzbot+5d4cb6b4409edfd18646@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d4cb6b4409edfd18646
Tested-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>
I guess the problem is addressed by commit 4efaa5acf0a1 ("epoll: be better
about file lifetimes") which was pushed upstream just before v6.9-rc7.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000002d631f0615918f1e@xxxxxxxxxx/
Yeah, Linus took care of that after convincing Al that this is really a bug.

They key missing information was that we have a mutex which makes sure that
fput() blocks for epoll to stop the polling.

It also means that you should probably re-consider using epoll together with
shared DMA-bufs. Background is that when both client and display server try
to use epoll the kernel will return an error because there can only be one
user of epoll.
I think for dma-buf implicit sync the best is to use the new fence export
ioctl, which has the added benefit that you get a snapshot and so no funny
livelock issues if someone keeps submitting rendering to a shared buffer.

+1


That aside, why can you not use the same file with multiple epoll files in
different processes? Afaik from a quick look, all the tracking structures
are per epoll file, so both client and compositor using it should work?

I haven't tried, so I just might be extremely blind ...

I've misunderstood one of the comments in the discussion.

You can't add the same file with the same file descriptor number to the same epoll file descriptor, but you can add it to different epoll file descriptors.

So using epoll in both client and server should actually work.

Sorry for the noise,
Christian.

-Sima





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux