On Thu 25-04-24 21:17:24, Kemeng Shi wrote: > The __folio_mark_dirty will not mark inode dirty any longer. Remove the > stale comment of it. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c > index 22e1acec899e..692c0da04cbd 100644 > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c > @@ -2721,8 +2721,7 @@ void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct bdi_writeback *wb) > } > > /* > - * Mark the folio dirty, and set it dirty in the page cache, and mark > - * the inode dirty. > + * Mark the folio dirty, and set it dirty in the page cache. > * > * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the folio is not uptodate and has > * not been truncated. > -- > 2.30.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
