Matthew Wilcox wrote: > In your earlier mail, you said the large value was found in db_agl2size. > If the problem is in agstart then diRead() is the right place to check it. Oh, I was so distracted last time that I wrote the explanation incorrectly. I'm sorry. To explain it accurately, if you pass a very large value to agstart and set the value passed to db_agl2size to be small, it can be manipulated so that a value greater than MAXAG is output when the "agstart >> db_agl2size" operation is performed. This results in an out-of-bounds vulnerability. And the final patch before is the one that fixes diRead(). Thanks.
