On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:46:24PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote: > Hi folks, > > The for-next branch of the xfs-linux repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git > > has just been updated. > > Patches often get missed, so please check if your outstanding patches > were in this update. If they have not been in this update, please > resubmit them to linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so they can be picked up in > the next update. > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit: > > 6a94b1acda7e xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) I've just noticed a regression in for-next - it was there prior to this update, but I hadn't run a 1kB block size fstests run in a while so I've only just noticed it. It is 100% reproducable, and may well be a problem with the partial filter matches in the test rather than a kernel bug... SECTION -- xfs_1k FSTYP -- xfs (debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test1 6.9.0-rc5-dgc+ #219 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Apr 24 08:30:50 AEST 2024 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m rmapbt=1 -b size=1k /dev/vdb MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/vdb /mnt/scratch xfs/348 19s ... - output mismatch (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_1k/xfs/348.out.bad) --- tests/xfs/348.out 2022-12-21 15:53:25.579041081 +1100 +++ /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_1k/xfs/348.out.bad 2024-04-24 08:34:43.718525603 +1000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ===== Find inode by file type: dt=1 => FIFO_INO dt=2 => CHRDEV_INO -dt=4 => DIR_INO +dt=4 => PARENT_INO108928 dt=6 => BLKDEV_INO dt=10 => DATA_INO ... (Run 'diff -u /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/tests/xfs/348.out /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_1k/xfs/348.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Failures: xfs/348 Failed 1 of 1 tests xfsprogs version installed on this test VM is: $ xfs_repair -V xfs_repair version 6.4.0 $ -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
