David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Consider the following example where a tcon is reused from different >> CIFS superblocks: >> >> mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts} # new super, new tcon >> mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts} # new super, reused tcon >> >> So, /mnt/1/dir/foo and /mnt/2/foo will lead to different inodes. >> >> The two mounts are accessing the same tcon (\\srv\share) but the new >> superblock was created because the prefix path "\dir" didn't match in >> cifs_match_super(). Trust me, that's a very common scenario. > > Why does it need to lead to a different superblock, assuming ${opts} is the > same in both cases? Can we not do as NFS does and share the superblock, > walking during the mount process through the directory prefix to the root > object? I don't know why it was designed that way, but the reason we have two different superblocks with ${opts} being the same is because cifs.ko relies on the value of cifs_sb_info::prepath to build paths out of dentries. See build_path_from_dentry(). So, when you access /mnt/2/foo, cifs.ko will build a path like '[optional tree name prefix] + cifs_sb_info::prepath + \foo' and then reuse connections (server+session+tcon) from first superblock to perform I/O on that file. > In other words, why does: > > mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts} > mount.cifs //srv/share/dir /mnt/2 -o ${opts} > > give you a different result to: > > mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o ${opts} > mount --bind /mnt/1/dir /mnt/2 Honestly, I don't know how bind works at VFS level. I see that the new superblock isn't created and when I access /mnt/2/foo, build_path_from_dentry() correctly returns '\dir\foo'.