On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:50:55AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > Jim Garlick wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:36:49AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > >> So, it's probably time to post my patch series to get some more eyes > >> looking at them. Who on the recipient list of this mail should I include > >> for the post? > > > > I'm keen to see Sage's patch land in -mm. I'd be happy to help review/test > > your changes if it would help move things along. > > Wow, at last some interest. > > I was beginning to think my painstaking effort had been wasted. > > We will need to verify the patch I've used for the VFS locking is > adequate because I had some difficulty working out which of the several > originally posted were the ones needed and at least one didn't even > apply. It will be included in the series I post. > > Since no-one else has replied I'll post the patch series and copy > everyone on the cc list of the original discussion and yourself. It's definitely not wasted. I have a patch series massaging the pathname resolution sitting in the local tree and once I'm done with the misc stuff (tonight, hopefully) it'll be time for that one. I was going to ask you to post once I get to that, since it clearly needs to be integrated. So if you have the patch series against the current mainline, please post it and I'll deal with that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
