Re: [PATCH 09/26] mm: Provide a means of invalidation without using launder_folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd have liked to have seen the first caller of this function too.

Looking again at my code, I also need to make netfs_unbuffered_write_iter()
use this function too.  I missed it before because that wasn't calling
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() directly, but rather going through
kiocb_invalidate_pages().

So I'll add those changes into this patch to give you a first caller.  I also
then need to make filemap_invalidate_inode() take a byte range.

David





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux