Re: [PATCH 11/26] 9p: Use alternative invalidation to using launder_folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shouldn't this include a call to filemap_invalidate_inode? Is just
> removing launder_folio enough to do this?

Good point.  netfs_unbuffered_write_iter() calls kiocb_invalidate_pages() -
which uses invalidate_inode_pages2_range() to discard the pagecache.  It
should probably use filemap_invalidate_inode() instead.

David





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux