Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:04:57PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 07:46:03PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > This looks like a straight-forward mathematical substitution of "dlimit"
> > with "search_buf + buf_size" and rearranging of the terms to make the
> > while loop offset "zero based" rather than "address based" and would
> > avoid overflow if "search_buf" was within one 4kB block of overflow:
> > 
> >    dlimit = search_buf + buf_size = 0xfffff000 + 0x1000 = 0x00000000
> Umm... maybe, but does riscv32 actually have a memory map where a
> kernel page would actually have an address in high memory like that?
> That seems.... unusual.

Would instanty break IS_ERR() and friends.  And those are arch-independent.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux