On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 04-04-24 14:12:15, Kees Cook wrote: > > Since __counted_by(handle_bytes) was added to struct file_handle, we need > > to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to > > accessing the flex array "f_handle". For robustness also check for a > > negative value for handle_bytes, which is possible for an "int", but > > nothing appears to set. > > > > Fixes: 1b43c4629756 ("fs: Annotate struct file_handle with __counted_by() and use struct_size()") > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > v2: more bounds checking, add comments, dropped reviews since logic changed > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403215358.work.365-kees@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > --- > > fs/fhandle.c | 11 +++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/fhandle.c b/fs/fhandle.c > > index 8a7f86c2139a..854f866eaad2 100644 > > --- a/fs/fhandle.c > > +++ b/fs/fhandle.c > > @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path, > > GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!handle) > > return -ENOMEM; > > + /* > > + * Since handle->f_handle is about to be written, make sure the > > + * associated __counted_by(handle_bytes) variable is correct. > > + */ > > + handle->handle_bytes = f_handle.handle_bytes; > > > > /* convert handle size to multiple of sizeof(u32) */ > > handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2; > > @@ -51,8 +56,8 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path, > > handle->handle_type = retval; > > /* convert handle size to bytes */ > > handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32); > > - handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes; > > - if ((handle->handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) || > > + /* check if handle_bytes would have exceeded the allocation */ > > + if ((handle_bytes < 0) || (handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) || > > This is broken. Let me explain: Userspace passes in struct file_handle > (ufh) and says how many bytes it has reserved for the variable length > contents in ufh->handle_bytes. We call exportfs_encode_fh() to create > the file handle. If it fits into the provided space, the function returns > in handle_dwords how many uints it has actually stored. If the handle > didn't fit, handle_dword contains number of uints we'd need in the variable > length part to be able to fit the handle in. > > Now your patch destroys this behavior by storing 0 to handle_bytes in case > the handle didn't fit *before* the returned value is actually stored to a > struct copied to userspace. Ah yes, I see now how they're used for separate things. I will respin again and possibly fix up the "int" to "u32" as suggested by willy. -- Kees Cook