Re: [PATCH v15 9/9] fuse: auto-invalidate inode attributes in passthrough mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/6/24 09:24, Amir Goldstein wrote:
After passthrough read/write, we invalidate a/c/mtime/size attributes
if the backing inode attributes differ from FUSE inode attributes.

Do the same in fuse_getattr() and after detach of backing inode, so that
passthrough mmap read/write changes to a/c/mtime/size attribute of the
backing inode will be propagated to the FUSE inode.

The rules of invalidating a/c/mtime/size attributes with writeback cache
are more complicated, so for now, writeback cache and passthrough cannot
be enabled on the same filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/fuse/dir.c         |  4 ++++
  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h      |  2 ++
  fs/fuse/inode.c       |  4 ++++
  fs/fuse/iomode.c      |  5 +++-
  fs/fuse/passthrough.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index 95330c2ca3d8..7f9d002b8f23 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -2118,6 +2118,10 @@ static int fuse_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
  		return -EACCES;
  	}
+ /* Maybe update/invalidate attributes from backing inode */
+	if (fuse_inode_backing(get_fuse_inode(inode)))
+		fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(inode, request_mask);
+
  	return fuse_update_get_attr(inode, NULL, stat, request_mask, flags);
  }
diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
index 98f878a52af1..4b011d31012f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -1456,6 +1456,8 @@ void fuse_backing_files_init(struct fuse_conn *fc);
  void fuse_backing_files_free(struct fuse_conn *fc);
  int fuse_backing_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_backing_map *map);
  int fuse_backing_close(struct fuse_conn *fc, int backing_id);
+void fuse_backing_update_attr(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb);
+void fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(struct inode *inode, u32 request_mask);
struct fuse_backing *fuse_passthrough_open(struct file *file,
  					   struct inode *inode,
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index c26a84439934..c68f005b6e86 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -1302,9 +1302,13 @@ static void process_init_reply(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_args *args,
  			 * on a stacked fs (e.g. overlayfs) themselves and with
  			 * max_stack_depth == 1, FUSE fs can be stacked as the
  			 * underlying fs of a stacked fs (e.g. overlayfs).
+			 *
+			 * For now, writeback cache and passthrough cannot be
+			 * enabled on the same filesystem.
  			 */
  			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH) &&
  			    (flags & FUSE_PASSTHROUGH) &&
+			    !fc->writeback_cache &&
  			    arg->max_stack_depth > 0 &&
  			    arg->max_stack_depth <= FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
  				fc->passthrough = 1;
diff --git a/fs/fuse/iomode.c b/fs/fuse/iomode.c
index c545058a01e1..96eb311fe7bd 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/iomode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/iomode.c
@@ -157,8 +157,11 @@ void fuse_file_uncached_io_end(struct inode *inode)
  	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
  	if (!uncached_io)
  		wake_up(&fi->direct_io_waitq);
-	if (oldfb)
+	if (oldfb) {
+		/* Maybe update attributes after detaching backing inode */
+		fuse_backing_update_attr(inode, oldfb);
  		fuse_backing_put(oldfb);
+	}
  }
/*
diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
index 260e76fc72d5..c1bb80a6e536 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
@@ -11,11 +11,8 @@
  #include <linux/backing-file.h>
  #include <linux/splice.h>
-static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
+static void fuse_backing_accessed(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
  {
-	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
-	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
-	struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
  	struct inode *backing_inode = file_inode(fb->file);
  	struct timespec64 atime = inode_get_atime(inode);
  	struct timespec64 batime = inode_get_atime(backing_inode);
@@ -25,11 +22,8 @@ static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
  		fuse_invalidate_atime(inode);
  }
-static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
+static void fuse_backing_modified(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
  {
-	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
-	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
-	struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
  	struct inode *backing_inode = file_inode(fb->file);
  	struct timespec64 ctime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
  	struct timespec64 mtime = inode_get_mtime(inode);
@@ -42,6 +36,51 @@ static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
  		fuse_invalidate_attr_mask(inode, FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE);
  }
+/* Called from fuse_file_uncached_io_end() after detach of backing inode */
+void fuse_backing_update_attr(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_backing *fb)
+{
+	fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
+	fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
+}
+
+/* Called from fuse_getattr() - may race with detach of backing inode */
+void fuse_backing_update_attr_mask(struct inode *inode, u32 request_mask)
+{
+	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
+	struct fuse_backing *fb;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	fb = fuse_backing_get(fuse_inode_backing(fi));
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (!fb)
+		return;
+
+	if (request_mask & FUSE_STATX_MODSIZE)
+		fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
+	if (request_mask & STATX_ATIME)
+		fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
+
+	fuse_backing_put(fb);
+}
+
+static void fuse_file_accessed(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
+	struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
+
+	fuse_backing_accessed(inode, fb);
+}
+
+static void fuse_file_modified(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+	struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
+	struct fuse_backing *fb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
+
+	fuse_backing_modified(inode, fb);
+}
+
  ssize_t fuse_passthrough_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
  {
  	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;

I noticed this patch doesn't seem to have made it into 6.9 like the rest of these passthrough patches -- may I ask why it didn't make it? I think it still makes sense but I might be missing some change between what's in 6.9 and this version of the patches.

Thanks!

Sweet Tea




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux