Re: [PATCH take 3][RFC] fat: Save FAT root directory timestamps to volume label

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello and thanks for your comments!

On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:33 +0900, "OGAWA Hirofumi"
<hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jorg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Standard FAT implementations cannot store any of the FAT root directory's
> > timestamps. This commit adds the mount option 'rootts', which allows saving
> > the FAT root directory timestamps as the timestamps of the FAT volume label
> > directory entry. At least Mac OS X is known to support the same mechanism
> > and interoperate with this commit.
> >
> > When mounting, the following values can be specified for the 'rootts' mount
> > option:
> >
...
> >
> >   "rootts=save"     tries to load and save the root directory's timestamps.
> >                     The mtime and atime are corrected based on root
> >                     directory entries' ctime. If the root directory was
> >                     accessed but no volume label entry exists, the label
> >                     "NO NAME" is created.
> 
> Um..., I'm still not sure though. rootts=save may not be needed for
> this, because it seems a bit complex, and it can do on userland...

It's true, that is quite of a hack after all. I just thought I'll try to
add the non-plus-ultra-feature on top of what Mac OS can do already.

But you're right, I'll get rid of the label creation. (And I think I
should get rid of the time stamp correction as well. If there is no
timestamp to be loaded, then 1970/1/1 should suffice. In case anyone
thinks that the timestamp 'correction' is anyhow useful, let me know...)

> 
> And some quick review of implement..
> 
> > +	if (inode->i_ino == MSDOS_ROOT_INO) {
> 
> In this path, we don't have inode->i_mutex, so to look directry up is
> wrong. I think adding label may move to userland.
> 
> I guess we should do all of preparation in fill_super().

True. This code is only needed for the time stamp creation, so it'll go
in any case.

> 
> > +			remove_inode_hash(inode);
> > +			fat_attach(inode, i_pos);
> > +			insert_inode_hash(inode);
> > +			brelse(bh);
> 
> Root inode should never change the position, so this shouldn't be
> needed.

Like above, this will be removed.

If 'preserve' (i.e. saving and loading the timestamp only IF a label is
present) is the default, I'll remove the 'rootts=preserve' option.
However, should there still be an option to switch this feature off
completely ('rootts=ignore')?

Thanks very much for your comments, the next version will come soon!

Jörg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux