Re: [PATCH 09/16] writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 16-09-09 15:24:47, Jens Axboe wrote:
> bdi_start_writeback() is currently split into two paths, one for
> WB_SYNC_NONE and one for WB_SYNC_ALL. Add bdi_sync_writeback()
> for WB_SYNC_ALL writeback and let bdi_start_writeback() handle
> only WB_SYNC_NONE.
> 
> Push down the writeback_control allocation and only accept the
> parameters that make sense for each function. This cleans up
> the API considerably.
> 
  Looks good.
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c           |  132 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  fs/ubifs/budget.c           |   20 +------
>  include/linux/backing-dev.h |    2 +-
>  include/linux/writeback.h   |    4 +-
>  mm/page-writeback.c         |   12 +---
>  5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 59b3ee6..5887328 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -74,14 +74,10 @@ static inline bool bdi_work_on_stack(struct bdi_work *work)
>  }
>  
>  static inline void bdi_work_init(struct bdi_work *work,
> -				 struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +				 struct wb_writeback_args *args)
>  {
>  	INIT_RCU_HEAD(&work->rcu_head);
> -	work->args.sb = wbc->sb;
> -	work->args.nr_pages = wbc->nr_to_write;
> -	work->args.sync_mode = wbc->sync_mode;
> -	work->args.range_cyclic = wbc->range_cyclic;
> -	work->args.for_kupdate = 0;
> +	work->args = *args;
>  	work->state = WS_USED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -194,7 +190,7 @@ static void bdi_wait_on_work_clear(struct bdi_work *work)
>  }
>  
>  static void bdi_alloc_queue_work(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> -				 struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +				 struct wb_writeback_args *args)
>  {
>  	struct bdi_work *work;
>  
> @@ -204,7 +200,7 @@ static void bdi_alloc_queue_work(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	 */
>  	work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (work) {
> -		bdi_work_init(work, wbc);
> +		bdi_work_init(work, args);
>  		bdi_queue_work(bdi, work);
>  	} else {
>  		struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb;
> @@ -214,24 +210,54 @@ static void bdi_alloc_queue_work(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -void bdi_start_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +/**
> + * bdi_sync_writeback - start and wait for writeback
> + * @bdi: the backing device to write from
> + * @sb: write inodes from this super_block
> + *
> + * Description:
> + *   This does WB_SYNC_ALL data integrity writeback and waits for the
> + *   IO to complete. Callers must hold the sb s_umount semaphore for
> + *   reading, to avoid having the super disappear before we are done.
> + */
> +static void bdi_sync_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> +			       struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * WB_SYNC_NONE is opportunistic writeback. If this allocation fails,
> -	 * bdi_queue_work() will wake up the thread and flush old data. This
> -	 * should ensure some amount of progress in freeing memory.
> -	 */
> -	if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
> -		bdi_alloc_queue_work(wbc->bdi, wbc);
> -	else {
> -		struct bdi_work work;
> +	struct wb_writeback_args args = {
> +		.sb		= sb,
> +		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_ALL,
> +		.nr_pages	= LONG_MAX,
> +		.range_cyclic	= 0,
> +	};
> +	struct bdi_work work;
>  
> -		bdi_work_init(&work, wbc);
> -		work.state |= WS_ONSTACK;
> +	bdi_work_init(&work, &args);
> +	work.state |= WS_ONSTACK;
>  
> -		bdi_queue_work(wbc->bdi, &work);
> -		bdi_wait_on_work_clear(&work);
> -	}
> +	bdi_queue_work(bdi, &work);
> +	bdi_wait_on_work_clear(&work);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * bdi_start_writeback - start writeback
> + * @bdi: the backing device to write from
> + * @nr_pages: the number of pages to write
> + *
> + * Description:
> + *   This does WB_SYNC_NONE opportunistic writeback. The IO is only
> + *   started when this function returns, we make no guarentees on
> + *   completion. Caller need not hold sb s_umount semaphore.
> + *
> + */
> +void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages)
> +{
> +	struct wb_writeback_args args = {
> +		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> +		.nr_pages	= nr_pages,
> +		.range_cyclic	= 1,
> +	};
> +
> +	bdi_alloc_queue_work(bdi, &args);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -863,23 +889,25 @@ int bdi_writeback_task(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Schedule writeback for all backing devices. Can only be used for
> - * WB_SYNC_NONE writeback, WB_SYNC_ALL should use bdi_start_writeback()
> - * and pass in the superblock.
> + * Schedule writeback for all backing devices. This does WB_SYNC_NONE
> + * writeback, for integrity writeback see bdi_sync_writeback().
>   */
> -static void bdi_writeback_all(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +static void bdi_writeback_all(struct super_block *sb, long nr_pages)
>  {
> +	struct wb_writeback_args args = {
> +		.sb		= sb,
> +		.nr_pages	= nr_pages,
> +		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> +	};
>  	struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
>  
> -	WARN_ON(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
> -
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list) {
>  		if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		bdi_alloc_queue_work(bdi, wbc);
> +		bdi_alloc_queue_work(bdi, &args);
>  	}
>  
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -891,17 +919,10 @@ static void bdi_writeback_all(struct writeback_control *wbc)
>   */
>  void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages)
>  {
> -	struct writeback_control wbc = {
> -		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> -		.older_than_this = NULL,
> -		.range_cyclic	= 1,
> -	};
> -
>  	if (nr_pages == 0)
>  		nr_pages = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
>  				global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
> -	wbc.nr_to_write = nr_pages;
> -	bdi_writeback_all(&wbc);
> +	bdi_writeback_all(NULL, nr_pages);
>  }
>  
>  static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
> @@ -1048,7 +1069,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mark_inode_dirty);
>   * on the writer throttling path, and we get decent balancing between many
>   * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on inode_sync_wait.
>   */
> -static void wait_sb_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode, *old_inode = NULL;
>  
> @@ -1056,7 +1077,7 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  	 * We need to be protected against the filesystem going from
>  	 * r/o to r/w or vice versa.
>  	 */
> -	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&wbc->sb->s_umount));
> +	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
>  
>  	spin_lock(&inode_lock);
>  
> @@ -1067,7 +1088,7 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  	 * In which case, the inode may not be on the dirty list, but
>  	 * we still have to wait for that writeout.
>  	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(inode, &wbc->sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
>  		struct address_space *mapping;
>  
>  		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW))
> @@ -1107,14 +1128,8 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
>   * for IO completion of submitted IO. The number of pages submitted is
>   * returned.
>   */
> -long writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> +void writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> -	struct writeback_control wbc = {
> -		.sb		= sb,
> -		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> -		.range_start	= 0,
> -		.range_end	= LLONG_MAX,
> -	};
>  	unsigned long nr_dirty = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY);
>  	unsigned long nr_unstable = global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
>  	long nr_to_write;
> @@ -1122,9 +1137,7 @@ long writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>  	nr_to_write = nr_dirty + nr_unstable +
>  			(inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused);
>  
> -	wbc.nr_to_write = nr_to_write;
> -	bdi_writeback_all(&wbc);
> -	return nr_to_write - wbc.nr_to_write;
> +	bdi_writeback_all(sb, nr_to_write);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
>  
> @@ -1135,21 +1148,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
>   * This function writes and waits on any dirty inode belonging to this
>   * super_block. The number of pages synced is returned.
>   */
> -long sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> +void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> -	struct writeback_control wbc = {
> -		.sb		= sb,
> -		.bdi		= sb->s_bdi,
> -		.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_ALL,
> -		.range_start	= 0,
> -		.range_end	= LLONG_MAX,
> -	};
> -	long nr_to_write = LONG_MAX; /* doesn't actually matter */
> -
> -	wbc.nr_to_write = nr_to_write;
> -	bdi_start_writeback(&wbc);
> -	wait_sb_inodes(&wbc);
> -	return nr_to_write - wbc.nr_to_write;
> +	bdi_sync_writeback(sb->s_bdi, sb);
> +	wait_sb_inodes(sb);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_inodes_sb);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> index 1c8991b..ee1ce68 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> @@ -54,29 +54,15 @@
>   * @nr_to_write: how many dirty pages to write-back
>   *
>   * This function shrinks UBIFS liability by means of writing back some amount
> - * of dirty inodes and their pages. Returns the amount of pages which were
> - * written back. The returned value does not include dirty inodes which were
> - * synchronized.
> + * of dirty inodes and their pages.
>   *
>   * Note, this function synchronizes even VFS inodes which are locked
>   * (@i_mutex) by the caller of the budgeting function, because write-back does
>   * not touch @i_mutex.
>   */
> -static int shrink_liability(struct ubifs_info *c, int nr_to_write)
> +static void shrink_liability(struct ubifs_info *c, int nr_to_write)
>  {
> -	int nr_written;
> -
> -	nr_written = writeback_inodes_sb(c->vfs_sb);
> -	if (!nr_written) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Re-try again but wait on pages/inodes which are being
> -		 * written-back concurrently (e.g., by pdflush).
> -		 */
> -		nr_written = sync_inodes_sb(c->vfs_sb);
> -	}
> -
> -	dbg_budg("%d pages were written back", nr_written);
> -	return nr_written;
> +	writeback_inodes_sb(c->vfs_sb);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> index 859e797..0ee33c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent,
>  		const char *fmt, ...);
>  int bdi_register_dev(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, dev_t dev);
>  void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
> -void bdi_start_writeback(struct writeback_control *wbc);
> +void bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages);
>  int bdi_writeback_task(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
>  int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index 48a054e..75cf586 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ struct writeback_control {
>   */	
>  struct bdi_writeback;
>  int inode_wait(void *);
> -long writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
> -long sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
> +void writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
> +void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
>  void writeback_inodes_wbc(struct writeback_control *wbc);
>  long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait);
>  void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages);
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 12c3d84..1eea4fa 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -582,16 +582,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
>  	if ((laptop_mode && pages_written) ||
>  	    (!laptop_mode && ((nr_writeback = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY)
>  					  + global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS))
> -					  > background_thresh))) {
> -		struct writeback_control wbc = {
> -			.bdi		= bdi,
> -			.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> -			.nr_to_write	= nr_writeback,
> -		};
> -
> -
> -		bdi_start_writeback(&wbc);
> -	}
> +					  > background_thresh)))
> +		bdi_start_writeback(bdi, nr_writeback);
>  }
>  
>  void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page, int page_mkwrite)
> -- 
> 1.6.4.1.207.g68ea
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux