Hi! > So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses. Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@xxxxxxx
Hi! > So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses. Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@xxxxxxx
![]() |