Re: [PATCH v13 2/9] f2fs: Simplify the handling of cached insensitive names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Please, make sure you actually stress test this patchset with fstests
>> against both f2fs and ext4 before sending each new version.
>
> I did run the xfstests, however, maybe I did not run the full suite, or maybe I am
> running it in a wrong way ?

No worries.  Did you manage to reproduce it?

> How are you running the kvm-xfstests with qemu ? Can you share your command
> arguments please ?

I don't use kvm-xfstests.  I run ./check directly:

export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
export SCRATCH_MNT=$BASEMNT/scratch
export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
export TEST_DIR=$BASEMNT/test
export RESULT_BASE=${BASEMNT}/results
export REPORT_DIR=${BASEMNT}/report
export FSTYP=f2fs

mkfs.f2fs -f -C utf8 -O casefold ${TEST_DEV}

./check -g encrypt,quick

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux