On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:15:04PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 02:43:11PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:12:33AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On 08.03.24 03:29, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > Add a new statx field for (sub)volume identifiers, as implemented by > > > > btrfs and bcachefs. > > > > > > > > This includes bcachefs support; we'll definitely want btrfs support as > > > > well. > > > > > > For btrfs you can add the following: > > > > > > > > > From 82343b7cb2a947bca43234c443b9c22339367f68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx> > > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:09:36 +0100 > > > Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: provide subvolume id for statx > > > > > > Add the inode's subvolume id to the newly proposed statx subvol field. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > Thanks, will fold, once I hear from Josef. > > Can we try to make 6.9? Need to know what to put in the manpage, and > I've got userspace tooling that wants to use it. Hm, I understand that you want to see this done but I think it's just too tight. If this would've been Acked last week then we could've done it the second week of the merge window. So my reaction is to wait for v6.10. What do others think?
