Re: [PATCH 2/2] pidfd: add pidfdfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> What is the risk this will not stay entirely optional?  I.e. can it
> become a requirement for modern userspace, and thus be used as a stick
> to kill support for 32-bit architectures?

Yeah, Linus has requested to remove the config option.
I'm about to send him a patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux