Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] fs: iomap: Sub-extent zeroing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/03/2024 21:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
index bcd3f8cf5ea4..733f83f839b6 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
  {
  	const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
  	struct inode *inode = iter->inode;
-	unsigned int fs_block_size = i_blocksize(inode), pad;
+	unsigned int zeroing_size, pad;
  	loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
  	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
  	blk_opf_t bio_opf;
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
  	size_t copied = 0;
  	size_t orig_count;
+ zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode) << iomap->extent_shift;
The iomap interfaces use units of bytes for offsets, sizes, ranges,
etc. Using shifts to define a granularity value seems like a
throwback to decades old XFS code and just a bit weird nowdays.  Can
we just pass this as a byte count? i.e.:

	zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode);
	if (iomap->extent_size)
		zeroing_size = iomap->extent_size;

Fine

I was also thinking of something like i_extentsize() for vfs, which would save requiring adding iomap->extent_size, but decided to limit vfs changes.

Thanks,
John




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux