Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] pagemap.rst: Document write bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "David Hildenbrand" <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "richard" <richard@xxxxxx>, "linux-mm" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> +   Bit 58 is useful to detect CoW mappings; however, it does not indicate
>> +   whether the page mapping is writable or not. If an anonymous mapping is
>> +   writable but the write bit is not set, it means that the next write access
>> +   will cause a page fault, and copy-on-write will happen.
> That is not true.

Can you please help me correct my obvious misunderstanding?

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux